Peer-review Process

	All manuscripts intended for publication in the Journal of the Acoustical Society of Korea should be submitted by the ASK publication online system, and are handled through the peer-review process for scholarly publication. The submitted manuscripts are first assessed by the Editor-in-Chief. The manuscripts that are poorly written or not consistent with this journal’s scope will be rejected in this step. The approved manuscripts will be reviewed by two anonymous reviewers selected by the Editor-in-Chief or the Associate Editor assigned. During review process, the authors’ name and affiliation are open to the reviewers. The corresponding author will be notified regarding the decision to accept, reject, or request of revision of the manuscript within three weeks for regular publication and two weeks for accelerated publication. The manuscripts evaluated as “acceptance” is considered for publication. In case of other decisions, the Editor-in-Chief or Associate Editor assigned analyzes two reviewers’ comments thoroughly and makes the decision on revision or rejection. If a manuscript is classified as “revision”, the corresponding author should respond within one month, addressing the comments raised by the reviewers and submitting the revised manuscript. Then, the Editor-in-Chief or Associate Editor assigned should review the revised manuscript within two weeks whether it is necessary to have another review. The review process can be repeated if necessary. Finally, Editor-in-Chief or Associate Editor assigned makes the final decision on either “acceptance” or “rejection” of the manuscript for publication. The corresponding author is subsequently informed by the Editor-in-Chief of the final decision. When the final revised manuscript meets all ASK content and format requirements, it is scheduled for publication in the next available issue.

All manuscripts intended for publication in the Journal of the Acoustical Society of Korea should be submitted by the ASK publication online system, and are handled through the peer-review process for scholarly publication. The submitted manuscripts are first assessed by the Editor-in-Chief. The manuscripts that are poorly written or not consistent with this journal’s scope will be rejected in this step. The approved manuscripts will be reviewed by two anonymous reviewers selected by the Editor-in-Chief or the Associate Editor assigned. During review process, the authors’ name and affiliation are open to the reviewers. The corresponding author will be notified regarding the decision to accept, reject, or request of revision of the manuscript within three weeks for regular publication and two weeks for accelerated publication. The manuscripts evaluated as “acceptance” is considered for publication. In case of other decisions, the Editor-in-Chief or Associate Editor assigned analyzes two reviewers’ comments thoroughly and makes the decision on revision or rejection. If a manuscript is classified as “revision”, the corresponding author should respond within one month, addressing the comments raised by the reviewers and submitting the revised manuscript. Then, the Editor-in-Chief or Associate Editor assigned should review the revised manuscript within two weeks whether it is necessary to have another review. The review process can be repeated if necessary. Finally, Editor-in-Chief or Associate Editor assigned makes the final decision on either “acceptance” or “rejection” of the manuscript for publication. The corresponding author is subsequently informed by the Editor-in-Chief of the final decision. When the final revised manuscript meets all ASK content and format requirements, it is scheduled for publication in the next available issue.